Tuesday, January 19, 2021

Wonder Woman 1984 FILM REVIEW

 


Wonder Woman 1984 was an eagerly anticipated release. The sequel was first scheduled for release in November 2019. It also comes at a tumultuous time for DC’s Expanded Universe. Aside from the underperforming Birds of Prey, WW ’84 was the first of those films to come out since Shazam! in spring 2019; almost an entire lifetime ago in Covid time. On top of that, the film was a sacrificial lamb of sorts to test out their new plan of releasing films in the theatre and their streaming platform, HBO Max. Was it worth it? Did the film benefit from those extra months in post-production?


Patty Jenkins returns as director as well as working on the story and screenplay with Geoff Johns and David Callaham. None of them were credited with the story or screenplay for the first film. Considering both films bragged about the number of women involved with the production, it’s amazing they couldn’t come up another female writer anywhere in Hollywood. This film is less disjointed than the last one. The final battle doesn’t feel like a sudden chore that has to be done for a superhero film. WW84 is much more ambitious. While the commercials advertise two villains, the real villain is less able to spot and far more sinister; greed especially greed fueled by capitalism. Perhaps they were two ambitious. Brief flashes of Maxwell Lord (Pedro Pascal) suffering racism and lightening his hair to blend in hint at what could have been a deeper sympathetic story. Barbara Ann Minerva (Kristen Wiig) suffers even more from missed opportunities.


Minerva is a standard trope in this film; “From Nobody to Nightmare” as TvTropes calls it. She’s an over-achieving lonely scientist who just wants a friend. Of course, anyone would want to emulate Diana (Gal Gadot). She appears to be perfect; the total opposite of Minerva even while claiming otherwise. However, many viewers, even those not familiar with Minerva’s relationship with Etta Candy (Lucy Davis) in the comics, thought they saw more between Minerva and Diana, a palpable chemistry. In the source material, Diana is a confirmed bisexual with at least one girlfriend. The films appear less true to her roots. While it’s fun to see Steve Trevor (Chris Pine) again and it does provide motivation for Diana’s most selfish desire, it also feels like the biggest No homo moment since Star Wars: The Force Awakens introduced a random ex-girlfriend for Poe Dameron.


WW84 ignores some glaring consent issues in bringing Trevor back. Instead of a magical new body or reanimated corpse, Trevor’s soul is using the body of someone else without their consent. Thus, that person has no say in how Trevor is using their body, including sex with Diana. The issue has been laughed off by some, including Jenkins, as the lovable body swap trope from the 1980s. Not everything from the ‘80s is still lovable or should be bought back. Modern audiences more attuned to the rape aspect of non-consensual body swap are a big reason that Lady Loki was changed from using Sif’s body to changing her own male body into a female form. How can DC be that clueless?


The ‘80s was picked for its link to greed and consumer consumption. This makes sense. However, most of the audience has been spoiled by Stranger Things, the Netflix series excels at making the story feel like it’s fully in the ‘80s at all times, including lingo, music and pop culture references. WW84 can feel more like a middle schooler’s history project at times, guessing at what that decade was like. The '80s aren’t fully integrated into the story and characters as it is with Stranger Things.


Despite all of this, the charges of racism and the computer effects that look like 2004, WW84 is quite fun. It’s not as fun as Birds of Prey, but it works for an afternoon. It’s definitely a throwback to decades ago when Wonder Woman ruled the television screen. It even features a couple of appearances by that Wonder Woman, Lynda Carter, as Asteria, another Amazonian. Hopefully, she’ll become a major character in the rumored Themyscira HBO Max series or Wonder Woman 3 already confirmed as people debate whether this one was even worth it. The film is worth it even though the tone is too retro for modern audiences.


7 out of 10



Friday, January 15, 2021

The Raybearer REVIEW SPOILERS

 


The Raybearer by Jordan Ifueko is a book that deserves more attention. There are times when people proclaim that Young Adult novels are dead or even worse, superfluous. The worst written of the genre can leave a bad taste in the mouth and brain while inspiring dozens of imitators. Then, there are times when when the book you're reading is nothing less than magic itself; a spell that makes one nothing else than being immersed in the story while also not wanting it to end. Ifueko's tale is such a book. 


Jordan Ifueko has crafted a world in The Raybearer no less thought out or conceived than Tolkien or Martin. There are over twelve realms. Each has its own language, culture, geography and motives. Many online have analyzed them trying to find which countries Ifueko borrowed from as though they assumed her work to be like the Black Panther film; lovingly borrowing from all of Africa. Her own biography mentions her collection of Black Panther Funko Pops. However, the Nigerian-American uses an entire lifetime of influences in her work as well as her historical research into pre-colonial West Africa. When Fatima on Goodreads asked, "Is Kirah's religion (People of the Wing) based on Islam? That's where my thoughts went when the book said she wears a prayer scarf over her hair", Ifueko responded, "No, not at all, actually! People of the Wing, along with their head coverings, are loosely inspired by a sect of Christianity that I grew up with as a kid. Many in this sub-sect believed in covering their heads with prayer shawls (due to some verses commanding that they do so in the New Testament). As a fun side fact, Kirah's struggles with her family's gender roles are directly based on my own struggles with the conservative Evangelical sect I grew up in. All of the religions in RAYBEARER, however, are mostly fictional, with occasional inspirations from my life experiences."


The most incredible world building on this planet would be worth nothing if the characters were boring or unlikable. The Raybearer excels at its characters as well. The main protagonist is Tarisai. As with the best title characters, she has been raised apart; starved of affection and knowledge about herself. Her quest will take the length of the book and, like the rest of us, still not be fully done. Kirah, mentioned above, becomes one of her closest confidantes. It's also refreshing to have her natural hair described in all its various braids and forms until it's as free as she has become. Although super-powered, Tarisai escapes the Mary Sue trope by making mistakes and subverting the "liking" requirement. How can you know who to trust if people liking you turns out to be one of your superpowers? How far does people liking you really get you in politics and centuries old feuds? This isn't a superficial book. The environment might be rooted in the past yet many of the debates are grounded in today. Can females be accepted alongside men as rulers? How far should a ruler go in the name of peace? Can a world truly be united if they're forced to let go of what makes them unique? 


Tarisai is supposed to kill Ekundayo, the future prince coddled from birth. He suffers from the same power of everyone liking him so even if they go against his wishes, he's not told why. Dayo doesn't travel and meets few others unless they're destined to be on his council. Unlike other fictional royalty, he's not commanded to excel in everything. His birth, powers and an heir are all that's required of him. The rest will be accomplished by his council. Ignorance makes it easier for Dayo not to question things, but he still finds a way. It's intriguing to think what might happen with his character in the future. Also, he's Asexual. Yay, representation! Plus, take that YA gods who demand a love triangle in every series.


The Raybearer is divided into four parts, similar to a run in a comic book series featuring a specific plot. Ifueko's love of comics is evident. Each part not only adds to the reader's knowledge, but also the momentum until the fourth part demands full attention and bated breath at what could happen next. It feels like anything could happen and it usually does; not just creating more conflict but more puzzle pieces about what's going on except the puzzle is about a thousand pieces. It is a relief that the book ends on a satisfied note. However, the pain of reaching that last page still demands searching for a sequel release date: sometime this year. 


Have you read The Raybearer by Jordan Ifueko? If not, you've missed out on one of the best books of 2020. It's definitely one of 2020's redeeming factors. Already, the temptation to start it all over again calls to me. There should be visual adaptations, maybe even a graphic novel. It can be found at any bookstore along with many libraries and Hoopla!


9.5 out of 10


Read more about Jordan Ifueko at We Need Diverse Books 

Q&A With Jordan Ifueko, Raybearer (diversebooks.org)